Microneedling vs. Microchanneling: Which Treatment Is Better for Your Skin?
When it comes to anti-aging skincare, we're always on the lookout for new ways to keep our skin young, supple, and glowing. The skincare world is filled with treatments that promise these benefits, such as Microlaser Peels, Microneedling, and Microchanneling. Though they all serve to stimulate collagen, one of the most important elements in keeping skin firm and youthful, each treatment works differently.
In this post, we’re comparing two popular treatments: Microneedling and Microchanneling. Both aim to boost collagen production but in very different ways. Here’s what you need to know to make the right choice for your skin.
Why We Love Microneedling
Microneedling has quickly gained popularity for its ability to offer laser-like results without the intense heat, redness, and extended downtime often associated with laser treatments. The idea behind microneedling is simple: by creating tiny "wounds" in the skin with fine needles, the body’s natural healing process kicks in to stimulate collagen production, resulting in firmer, more youthful skin.
However, as we’ve learned more about microneedling over the years, certain concerns have surfaced. When not performed correctly, microneedling can actually cause scar collagen to form, which can negatively impact the skin's texture, especially as we age. Creating channels in the skin with needles can also open the door to infections if proper hygiene isn’t followed.
There’s also the risk of granulomas—small, hard lumps under the skin caused by improper molecular-sized ingredients being needled into the skin. This can leave the skin looking uneven, and the texture may appear lumpy. Unfortunately, not all professionals are well-trained in microneedling, and some even operate outside their scope of practice, which can lead to poor outcomes.
While microneedling remains a fantastic option when performed by a highly trained professional, advancements in skincare have introduced a newer, less invasive alternative that is gaining traction: Microchanneling.
Step in: Microchanneling
Often referred to by various names like Nanofilling, Regenerate, or Procell, Microchanneling has quickly become a smarter alternative to microneedling. While both treatments aim to stimulate collagen, microchanneling does so with less invasiveness and fewer risks.
Why Microchanneling is Better for the Skin
Unlike microneedling, microchanneling doesn’t create deep wounds. Instead, it uses silicone-coated pyramid structures that gently push the skin aside rather than puncturing it. Some devices resemble a microneedling pen, while others use a stamp-like tool to treat the skin area by area.
With microchanneling, the skin realigns itself in just 30 minutes, allowing for quicker recovery and minimizing inflammation. This method also increases blood flow to the skin, delivering more nutrients and encouraging the removal of dead skin cells—all without the irritation, redness, or downtime that comes with microneedling.
Another major advantage of microchanneling is that it offers a non-inflammatory way to introduce active skincare products deeper into the skin. Because the treatment avoids creating deeper wounds, it allows for better product penetration, resulting in enhanced skincare benefits.
Redness after a microchanneling session usually disappears within an hour, often before you even leave the clinic. This makes microchanneling a more comfortable option for those seeking a collagen-boosting treatment without extended recovery time.
Less Is More: The Shift Toward Minimal Invasive Skincare
As skincare technologies and techniques continue to evolve, there’s a growing trend toward treatments that promote healing with minimal inflammation. Rather than focusing on aggressive interventions, skincare professionals are increasingly recommending options that allow the body to heal naturally with as little damage as possible.
In this light, microchanneling is proving to be an excellent alternative to both microneedling and laser treatments. It delivers similar results in terms of collagen stimulation, anti-aging, and skin rejuvenation, but with far fewer side effects and risks. The downside to this treatment is that it needs to be done regularly with high quality products to see the most benefit.
While microneedling remains a popular and effective treatment when performed by experienced professionals, microchanneling offers a less invasive, safer alternative with minimal downtime. Whether you’re looking to smooth fine lines, reduce wrinkles, or improve overall skin texture, microchanneling might be the smarter choice for long-term skin health.
By choosing microchanneling, you’ll be opting for a gentler approach to collagen stimulation, allowing your skin to recover more quickly and stay youthful with fewer complications, skin rep and down time.
Danielle is a licensed esthetician in the state of Colorado and owner of Derma Lab. She is a Face Reality Certified Acne Specialist and has been in the industry since 2007. Danielle has worked in spas & medi spas, and has been trained in chemical peels, microdermabrasion, microneedling and Sciton Laser Systems. Nothing here is meant to be medical advice.
Colorado Springs Esthetician
Esthetician in Colorado Springs
Address
Contact
Menu
Follow us
A website created in the WebWave website builder